Within Gipuzkoa UFOs
Was Gipuzkoa's Famous UFO Chase Just Jupiter?
Gipuzkoa's best-known UFO episode became dramatic because witnesses, vehicles and public expectation all followed one bright light.
On this page
- How the night time pursuit unfolded
- Why moving witnesses misread a distant light
- What the Jupiter explanation solves and leaves open
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Gipuzkoa’s famous night-time UFO chase was almost certainly not a close encounter, but a memorable case of people pursuing a bright astronomical object from moving vehicles. On the night of 10 to 11 July 1985, a report of a strange light near Urnieta led to DYA ambulance crews, a Red Cross ambulance, police and private cars following what they believed was an unusual object through inland Gipuzkoa for several hours. Later sceptical reconstruction identifies the light as Jupiter, then bright, low and conspicuous in the south-eastern sky.[Magonia]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…

The case matters because it is one of the clearest Gipuzkoa examples of how a local UFO story can grow in real time. It involved sincere witnesses, emergency-service radio traffic, local press attention and apparently responsible checks with observatories, airports and air-traffic control. Yet the strongest explanation does not require a craft, radar target or unknown aerial vehicle. It requires a bright planet, dark roads, changing sightlines, expectation and the powerful feeling that a distant light is “keeping ahead” of those chasing it.[Magonia+2Misterios del Aire]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…
How the night-time pursuit unfolded
The episode began at about 22:30 on 10 July 1985, when a caller contacted El Diario Vasco to report a strange light above or near the Urnieta road, between Hernani and Tolosa. The caller described a bright, flash-like light and an apparently spherical object near Mount Adarra, claiming that it moved in intervals, sometimes slowly and sometimes faster than an aircraft or helicopter. The newspaper then contacted the DYA emergency service, not to declare a UFO event as fact, but to check whether anything unusual was actually being seen.[Magonia]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…
Around midnight, the story moved from a single call to a mobile pursuit. A DYA ambulance crew near Antzuola reported seeing an odd light in the sky, described in later accounts as something that seemed to grow and shrink. From the DYA centre in San Sebastián, the crew were reportedly told to follow the light and see where it led. That instruction was crucial: once the sighting became a chase, every bend, hill, horizon line and change in vehicle direction could make a fixed distant light appear to behave like a moving object.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
The route gave the incident its distinctive inland Gipuzkoa character. The reported pursuit passed through or around the Descarga pass, Urretxu, Zumarraga and Legazpi, with further movement towards the Barrendiola reservoir area near Brinkola. A Red Cross ambulance, municipal police, the Ertzaintza and private cars were said to have joined or become involved as the account spread. The next-day press treatment reportedly described the convoy as an “authentic procession”, a phrase that captures why this case endured locally: it was not just a witness saying “I saw a light”, but a small public drama on the roads of the province.[Magonia]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…
The chase reportedly lasted for about five hours, ending towards dawn. That duration is one of the first clues that the object was probably not a nearby vehicle or aircraft. A plane, helicopter, balloon or low-level object would normally change its apparent position, disappear, land, pass overhead, show navigation lights, be heard, or be tracked by aviation channels. A planet, by contrast, can remain visible for hours while appearing to shift slowly across the sky as the Earth rotates.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
Why the story felt stronger than an ordinary light
The 1985 chase is often remembered as stronger than a casual sky report because the witnesses were not presented as isolated cranks. Ambulance crews, police and other drivers are socially credible observers, and their involvement made the event feel practical, public and immediate. That is exactly why the case is useful: credible people can still misread the sky when the viewing conditions are poor and the social situation is primed for an extraordinary interpretation.[Magonia]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…
Several features made misinterpretation easier. The witnesses were moving through a hilly inland landscape at night. Their view of the horizon would have changed repeatedly as roads curved, climbed and descended. A light seen above a pass, reservoir or ridge can seem tied to the landscape even when it is far beyond it. If the observer then drives towards the apparent position, the light may appear to retreat, swing sideways, rise, dim or vanish behind cloud or terrain.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
The case also seems to have been amplified by expectation. Once the newspaper and DYA were discussing a strange light, later observers were not simply looking at the night sky; they were looking for the reported object. The Misterios del Aire reconstruction argues that local radio testimony helped feed the chase as more people became aware of the supposed object. This does not make the witnesses dishonest. It means they were interpreting an ambiguous stimulus inside a developing public story.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
This is a common pattern in UFO reports involving bright planets. The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry’s discussion of UFO identification notes that bright stars and planets can be misidentified from moving cars because they appear to keep pace with the observer. Space.com has also noted that conspicuous planets, especially Venus and Jupiter, are recurring sources of UFO reports because they can appear as unusually bright lights hanging in the sky.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical InquirerUFO Identification ProcessFor example, bright stars and planets may become UFOs due to being watched from a moving car…
The Jupiter explanation
The Jupiter explanation is not just a vague “it was probably a star” dismissal. It is a reconstruction based on date, time, direction, brightness and the reported behaviour of the light. According to Juan Carlos Victorio’s analysis, when the DYA crew at Antzuola reported the object at around midnight, Jupiter was rising in the south-east at an azimuth of about 122 degrees and an elevation of roughly eight degrees above the horizon. That placed it in the same general direction as the supposed object near the Descarga area.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
Jupiter was also well placed to attract attention. It was approaching opposition in early August 1985, the period when the planet is opposite the Sun in the sky and is generally at its best for night-time viewing. The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada’s 1985 Observer’s Handbook lists Jupiter’s apparent equatorial diameter as reaching its 1985 maximum at opposition on 4 August, supporting the claim that Jupiter was then especially prominent.[RASC]rasc.caObserversHandbook 1985ObserversHandbook 1985
The explanation also fits the reported end of the chase. As dawn approached, Jupiter would have become harder to see against the brightening sky. A nearby object fleeing the convoy would need an additional explanation for why it vanished without independent confirmation; a planet fading into daylight needs none.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
Most importantly, the Jupiter explanation fits the absence of confirming evidence from the systems one would expect to notice a genuine aerial event. Later accounts say El Diario Vasco checked with the Igueldo and Arantzazu observatories, San Sebastián and Sondika airports, and the Paracuellos control centre near Madrid, with no unusual aerial traffic or phenomenon confirmed over Gipuzkoa that night. That does not prove that nothing at all was seen; it strongly supports the narrower conclusion that the thing seen was not an unusual aircraft or intruding object.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
Why moving witnesses misread a distant light
The key to the chase is the difference between actual motion and apparent motion. A nearby object changes position against foreground features quickly. A planet is effectively fixed at an enormous distance, but an observer in a car experiences a constantly changing foreground: trees, ridges, road signs, bends, buildings and valley walls. The brain tries to turn those changing visual relationships into a story about where the light is and what it is doing.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical InquirerUFO Identification ProcessFor example, bright stars and planets may become UFOs due to being watched from a moving car…
A bright planet low on the horizon can therefore feel oddly “local”. It may appear to hover over a named place, sit above a ridge, line up with a pass, or move when the road turns. If several vehicles are moving in roughly similar directions, different observers may report the same light in slightly different relation to the landscape, which can make the story seem richer rather than weaker. In a live chase, those differences become part of the excitement: one witness sees it “ahead”, another thinks it has shifted, another believes it has changed size.
Changes in apparent size or shape are also not decisive evidence against a planetary explanation. Thin cloud, haze, windscreen distortion, glare, eye focus, fatigue and intermittent obstruction by terrain can make a bright point of light pulse, blur, flatten, disappear or reappear. Reports that the light grew, shrank or changed shape are therefore compatible with a bright object seen under unstable viewing conditions, especially when witnesses are in motion.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
There is also a psychological effect at work. The autokinetic effect is a visual illusion in which a small stationary light in a dark or featureless setting appears to move. It is usually discussed in relation to isolated points of light in darkness, but it helps explain why night-sky lights can feel mobile even when they are not. In the Gipuzkoa chase, that perceptual problem was made worse by vehicles, hills and radio-fed expectation.[Wikipedia]WikipediaAutokinetic effectAutokinetic effect
What the checks weakened
The most important investigative point is that the case did not remain only at the level of eyewitness excitement. The reported checks with observatories, airports and an air-traffic control centre are exactly the kind of cross-checks a careful reader should want in a UFO case. If the object had been a helicopter, aircraft, unusual flight path or other aerial traffic, there was at least a chance that aviation channels would have offered support. They did not.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
That weakens three common mystery readings of the case. First, it weakens the idea of a structured craft moving through Gipuzkoa for hours, because a long-duration aerial presence should leave more than road testimony. Secondly, it weakens the idea of a dramatic aviation incident, because the consulted airports and control centre reportedly had no matching record. Thirdly, it weakens the claim that the object was close to the convoy, because a close object should have changed relative position far more sharply as the vehicles moved through the valleys and towns.[Misterios del Aire]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
The absence of a Spanish military UFO file centred on this 1985 chase is also telling, although it should not be overstated. Spain’s Ministry of Defence describes its published UFO archive as 80 files and about 1,900 pages concerning strange aerial sightings in Spanish airspace in which Air Force personnel or material were involved in some way. The Defence archive’s title list includes many Spanish cases, including some from 1985, but the inland Gipuzkoa chase is not presented there as a major Air Force case.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.esBiblioteca Virtual Defensa Expedientes OVNIBiblioteca Virtual Defensa Expedientes OVNI
That does not mean the local event was imaginary. It means it appears to belong mainly to the category of local press, emergency-service and witness history rather than to the category of radar-backed or military-investigated Spanish UFO incidents. For a province-level history of Gipuzkoa, that distinction matters: the story is locally important precisely because it shows how a memorable UFO event can exist without becoming a strong official mystery.
What the Jupiter explanation solves and leaves open
The Jupiter interpretation solves the central mechanics of the case. It explains why the light was visible for hours, why it seemed to remain ahead of vehicles, why it was low and bright, why it faded with dawn, and why aviation checks did not support an unusual aircraft or craft. It also explains why a night-time road chase could become more dramatic as more people joined in: they were not catching up with an object, because the object was never on the roads or over the next ridge.[Misterios del Aire+2Magonia]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
It leaves open smaller historical questions rather than a large aerial mystery. The exact wording of every radio exchange, the full list of vehicles involved, the precise positions of each witness and the detailed weather conditions along the route are not all equally well preserved in accessible sources. Later summaries rely heavily on the original local press account and on sceptical reconstructions published decades after the event. That means the strongest conclusion should be stated carefully: Jupiter is the best-supported explanation, not because every anecdotal detail can be re-created, but because it fits the main reported facts better than the alternatives.[Magonia]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…
The case also leaves open a question about memory. In 2015, thirty years after the event, El Diario Vasco reportedly revisited the story in a more mysterious register, while sceptical writers criticised that framing and pointed back to the Jupiter explanation already suggested at the time. This later retelling matters because it shows how local UFO stories can regain drama even after a plausible explanation has been available for years.[Magonia]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…
What it does not leave open is a strong reason to treat the chase as evidence of an unknown craft. The evidential balance runs the other way: a known bright planet was in the right part of the sky, at the right time, under conditions that commonly produce UFO misidentifications, while independent aviation confirmation was lacking.[Misterios del Aire+2Skeptical Inquirer]misteriosdelaire.blogspot.comel ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo…
Why this case still matters in Gipuzkoa’s UFO history
The 1985 inland chase remains useful because it is more than a debunked curiosity. It is a compact lesson in how UFO history is made: a first report, an institutional relay, moving witnesses, local media attention, group reinforcement, attempted verification and later reinterpretation. The story is vivid because it involved real places in Gipuzkoa — Urnieta, Antzuola, Descarga, Urretxu, Zumarraga, Legazpi and Brinkola — rather than an abstract light “somewhere in the sky”.[Magonia]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…
It also helps separate three categories that often blur together in public UFO discussion. An event can be sincerely witnessed, socially memorable and still explained. It can involve police or emergency services without becoming official proof of an unknown object. And it can enter local folklore even when the most economical explanation is astronomical. Those distinctions are essential for reading Gipuzkoa’s UFO record fairly.
Compared with cases that appear in Spain’s declassified Air Force material, the 1985 chase is not important because it left a heavy official file. It is important because it shows the public-facing side of the phenomenon: how a province experiences a UFO episode as a shared night of confusion, excitement and debate. In that sense, the Jupiter explanation does not make the case worthless. It makes it clearer, more instructive and more honest.
A fair verdict
The fairest reading is that Gipuzkoa’s 1985 inland light chase was a real social event built around a misidentified celestial object. People did see something. The pursuit did happen in some form. The story did involve emergency-service vehicles, police attention, local press interest and hours of public curiosity. But the best-supported object at the centre of it was Jupiter, not a craft manoeuvring through inland Gipuzkoa.[Magonia]magonia.comLa noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYAJuly 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim…
That verdict is not an insult to the witnesses. Night skies are difficult, bright planets can be startling, and moving vehicles are poor observation platforms. The lesson of the 1985 chase is not that people are foolish; it is that perception is fragile when a distant light is seen in darkness, through expectation, from a road that never stops changing direction.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Was Gipuzkoa's Famous UFO Chase Just Jupiter?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Helps classify and assess light-in-the-sky reports from moving witnesses.
UFOs Explained
Matches the page's focus on ordinary astronomical objects behind UFO reports.
The Demon-Haunted World
Directly supports critical thinking about how sincere witnesses can misread sky phenomena.
Bad Astronomy
Useful for readers interested in how planets, perspective and expectation fool observers.
Endnotes
1.
Source: magonia.com
Title: La noche que la Ertzaintza, la Cruz Roja y la DYA
Link:https://magonia.com/2015/07/17/persecucion-policial-ovni-guipuzcoa/
Source snippet
July 17, 2015 — 17 Jul 2015 — En la noche del 10 al 11 de julio de 1985, Guipúzcoa fue escenario de una persecución de un ovni sim...
Published: July 17, 2015
2.
Source: rasc.ca
Title: ObserversHandbook 1985
Link:https://www.rasc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/ObserversHandbook-1985.pdf
3.
Source: space.com
Title: 14884 jupiter venus mistaken ufos
Link:https://www.space.com/14884-jupiter-venus-mistaken-ufos.html
4.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Autokinetic effect
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autokinetic_effect
5.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter
6.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Robert Sheaffer
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Sheaffer
7.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Unidentified flying object
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidentified_flying_object
8.
Source: w390w.gipuzkoa.net
Link:https://w390w.gipuzkoa.net/WAS/CORP/DKPAtzokoPrentsaWEB/argitalpen/178866
9.
Source: w390w.gipuzkoa.net
Link:https://w390w.gipuzkoa.net/WAS/CORP/DKPAtzokoPrentsaWEB/databilaketa/bilatu?amaieraTimestamp=1640991600000&argitalpenak=&entitatea=0&hasieraTimestamp=-473389200000&hitzak=Luis+Heriz+Telleria&indiceFila=0&iragaziAmaieraTimestamp=&iragaziArgitalpena=&iragaziHasieraTimestamp=&iragaziMota=-1&orria=0&page=8
10.
Source: archive.org
Link:https://archive.org/details/ufosightingsevid0000shea
11.
Source: in-the-sky.org
Link:https://in-the-sky.org/newscal.php?maxdiff=6&month=1&year=1985
12.
Source: misteriosdelaire.blogspot.com
Title: el ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985
Link:https://misteriosdelaire.blogspot.com/2015/07/el-ovni-que-sobrevolo-gipuzkoa-en-1985.html
Source snippet
Misterios del AireEl OVNI que sobrevoló Gipúzkoa en 198515 Jul 2015 — "Hace treinta años cientos de guipuzcoanos pasaron la noche en vilo...
13.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2018/11/ufo-identification-process/
Source snippet
Skeptical InquirerUFO Identification ProcessFor example, bright stars and planets may become UFOs due to being watched from a moving car...
14.
Source: bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es
Title: Biblioteca Virtual Defensa Expedientes OVNI
Link:https://bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es/BVMDefensa/exp_ovni/es/micrositios/inicio.do
15.
Source: bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es
Title: Biblioteca Virtual Defensa Listado de títulos
Link:https://bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es/BVMDefensa/exp_ovni/es/consulta/indice_campo.do?campo=idtitulo
16.
Source: bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es
Title: defensa.gob.es Revista de historia militar
Link:https://bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es/BVMDefensa/exp_ovni/es/publicaciones/verNumero.do?anyo=1961&idPublicacion=85
17.
Source: despiertaalfuturo.blogspot.com
Title: el ovni que sobrevolo gipuzkoa en 1985
Link:https://despiertaalfuturo.blogspot.com/2015/07/el-ovni-que-sobrevolo-gipuzkoa-en-1985.html
Additional References
18.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZHy9ASOj8w
Source snippet
Breakdown of the Pentagon UFO videos with Mick West...
19.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Jupiter and Venus ‘could be mistaken for UFOs’
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-ymwG9mDhE
Source snippet
UFOs, drones, mystery sightings: What government reports, NASA, and investigators say...
20.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100040013-4.pdf
21.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Breakdown of the Pentagon UFO videos with Mick West
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le7Fqbsrrm8
Source snippet
Talking Aliens with NASA UAP Chair, David Spergel...
22.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/29862891/LOS_OVNIS_Y_EL_EJERCITO_DEL_AIRE
23.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/RadioTelevisionCanaria/videos/50-a%C3%B1os-del-supuesto-avistamiento-ovni-en-gran-canariael-asunto-investigado-por-/1022442283980393/
24.
Source: ovniteca.net
Link:https://ovniteca.net/ovnis-en-la-red/expedientes-ovni-biblioteca-virtual-del-ministerio-de-defensa-de-espana
25.
Source: studocu.com
Link:https://www.studocu.com/es-mx/document/universidad-tecnologica-de-mexico/desarrollo-de-planes-de-exportacion/los-expedientes-ovni-desclasificados/23115065
26.
Source: x.com
Link:https://x.com/diariovasco/status/1960680552849142180
27.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/ArgentinaAtWar/posts/mirage-vs-ovni-en-la-ma%C3%B1ana-del-17-de-septiembre-de-1985-un-extra%C3%B1o-objeto-puso-/1064653662331966/
Topic Tree



