Within Girona UFOs
Why a Radar Site UFO Report Needs Caution
The Roses EVA-4 file matters because military radar sites can strengthen a report's interest while also multiplying ordinary explanations.
On this page
- What EVA 4 did at Roses
- Why military context changes reader expectations
- Ordinary causes a radar site may record
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The Roses radar-site UFO report is interesting precisely because it sounds, at first, like the kind of case that should be strong: a military air-surveillance unit, a night-time object over the installation, several guards as witnesses, and a file preserved in Spain’s official UFO archive. But the most important detail is also the most sobering one. The 13 September 1991 EVA-4 case was not a radar-confirmed unknown target. The file says a bright, silent, circular object was seen visually over the Roses air-surveillance site, while the radar-room operator reported no strange echo and no equipment anomaly. That makes the case valuable for Girona’s UFO history, but it also makes it a lesson in caution: a military setting can improve documentation without automatically improving identification.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.esOpen source on gob.es.
Within the Girona branch of Spain’s declassified UFO material, EVA-4 stands apart from the province’s civilian and airport-linked reports because the location itself was part of the Spanish air-defence system. The official catalogue lists the file as “Avistamiento de fenómenos extraños en EVA-4, Rosas (Gerona): 13 de Septiembre de 1991”, a nine-page record produced by the Air Operational Command’s intelligence section and declassified in February 1996.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.esOpen source on gob.es.
What EVA-4 did at Roses
EVA-4 was not an ordinary hilltop building with a radar dome. The Spanish Air and Space Force describes the Roses Air Barracks and Air Surveillance Squadron No. 4 as a key part of Spain’s air-defence system, located on the Pení mountain in Roses, Girona. Its modern mission is to obtain and transmit radar data for command-and-control use and to provide ground-to-air radio communications in its coverage area.[Ejercito Del Aire]ejercitodelaireydelespacio.defensa.gob.esUnidades - Unidad…
The site’s history also explains why UFO researchers pay attention to it. EVA-4 grew out of the 1953 Spanish-American agreements and the creation of Spain’s air-warning and control network in the 1950s. The Air Force’s unit history says construction began in 1957 under the name W-4 station, the site became operational in 1959 with personnel from the United States Air Force’s 875th Alert, Control and Warning Squadron, and it later passed fully to Spanish operation after the American unit was deactivated in 1964.[Ejercito Del Aire]ejercitodelaireydelespacio.defensa.gob.esUnidades - Unidad…
That background matters because it changes the reader’s expectations. A report from a radar squadron is not the same as a report from a beach, road or balcony. A military air-surveillance site has trained personnel, watch routines, communications channels and a reason to care about aerial activity. But the same setting also creates a trap: readers may assume that “seen at a radar site” means “tracked by radar”. In the Roses file, that assumption is not supported by the record.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
The EVA-4 file belongs to Spain’s wider declassified UFO collection. The Defence Virtual Library describes the archive as covering unusual phenomena reported across Spanish airspace from 1962 to 1995, including both single-location sightings and events seen from multiple places or aircraft. Press coverage of the archive’s publication described 80 files and about 1,900 pages made available through the Defence Virtual Library.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.esBiblioteca Virtual Defensa Expedientes OVNIBiblioteca Virtual Defensa Expedientes OVNI
What was reported in September 1991
The event recorded in the EVA-4 file took place at about 04:12 on Friday, 13 September 1991. According to the file summary, the commander of the security guard at EVA-4 saw a luminous body circling over the main building of the installation. The object was described as spherical, about five metres in radius, roughly 150 metres above the site, making right-hand turns with an estimated radius of about 200 metres. The report says there was no sound and that the observation lasted around five or six minutes.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
The commander’s own statement adds the most vivid detail. He described looking up while outside near the sub-officers’ parking area and seeing a brilliant white circular object, with a brighter central part, moving in circles above the site at an estimated height between 100 and 200 metres. He estimated that it completed roughly one circle every six seconds. A guard corporal was called out and reportedly saw the same thing. When another recruit approached to look, the object was said to have disappeared instantly.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
The file also records an additional check that is crucial to interpreting the case. The operator on duty in the radar room was asked whether he had noticed anything abnormal in the equipment or any strange echo. He said no. That is the detail that prevents the Roses case from being honestly described as a radar-visual case. It is better understood as a visual sighting by military personnel at a radar installation, with a negative radar-room check.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
For Girona’s UFO history, that distinction is not a small technicality. A radar-confirmed case would suggest that a physical target, or at least a radar-returning phenomenon, was detected by instruments. A visual-only case at a radar site is still worth recording, especially because several personnel were involved, but it remains vulnerable to the familiar problems of night observation: distance, height, size and motion can all be difficult to judge when the observer lacks a fixed reference point.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
Why the military setting raises the stakes but not certainty
The strongest point in favour of taking the Roses report seriously is not that it proves an extraordinary object. It is that the report was made inside a formal military environment. The file identifies the location, date, chain of command and witness roles; the official catalogue identifies the authoring body as Spain’s Air Operational Command, General Staff, Intelligence Section; and the record was kept within the Air Force’s UFO files rather than surviving only as a newspaper anecdote.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.esOpen source on gob.es.
That gives the case more historical weight than many local UFO stories. The observer was not a casual passer-by; he was the commander of the security guard at an air-surveillance unit. Other guards were also mentioned. The event was written up, forwarded through military channels, and later declassified. For a province-level history of Girona UFO reports, EVA-4 is therefore one of the few cases where place, institution and archive all reinforce the importance of the report.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
But military context can also mislead readers. A guard commander is trained in security duties, not necessarily in astronomical identification, optical effects, drone-like object estimation, or the fine judgement of airborne size and range in darkness. The official record gives estimates of size, height, turning radius and speed-like behaviour, but it does not show that these estimates were independently measured. They are witness estimates, not instrument readings.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
The negative radar-room check is especially important because it cuts both ways. On one hand, it weakens the idea that EVA-4’s surveillance equipment detected a solid aerial intruder. On the other hand, it does not automatically disprove that the guards saw something. A light close to the site, an object below radar coverage, a small object, an optical effect, or a phenomenon outside the radar’s useful detection conditions could all produce a visual report without a meaningful radar return. The honest conclusion is narrower: the file documents a reported visual event at EVA-4, not an instrument-confirmed unknown aircraft.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
Ordinary causes a radar site may record
A radar site can make a UFO report more interesting, but it can also multiply ordinary explanations. Air-defence environments are built to notice things in the sky. That means they may record more unusual-looking lights, reflections, aircraft movements, weather effects and instrument quirks than an unwatched location would. The presence of radar does not remove ambiguity; it often gives investigators a second kind of evidence to compare with witness testimony.
The Roses file’s most obvious ordinary-explanation problem is that the report describes a bright white object circling silently over the installation, but without a corresponding anomalous radar echo. Several broad categories remain possible without claiming any one of them as proven:
- Local lights or reflections: A bright source reflecting off cloud, mist, a structure, glass or moving equipment can create apparent motion, especially when seen from a fixed point at night. The file’s “brighter central part” description is suggestive but not diagnostic.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
- Small airborne objects: Balloons, lightweight objects, birds lit from below, or other small targets can be visually striking while offering little or no useful radar return, depending on altitude, material, range and geometry.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govOpen source on nasa.gov.
- Misjudged distance and scale: The estimated five-metre radius and 100–200 metre height depend on visual judgement in darkness. Without triangulation or instrument measurement, a smaller nearby light can appear like a larger object farther away.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
- Atmospheric and radar effects in other cases: Although the Roses event was not radar-confirmed, radar operators generally must contend with false or misleading returns. NOAA explains that anomalous propagation can produce false radar echoes when atmospheric conditions bend the beam, and the US National Weather Service notes that such returns can appear even when there is no precipitation, especially on low-elevation scans.[NOAA]noaa.govanomalous propagationanomalous propagation
That last point is important for the wider theme of “military UFO reports”. Radar can strengthen a case when it independently matches a visual report, but radar is not magic. It has its own error modes: anomalous propagation, ground clutter, sea clutter, biological returns and other non-target echoes. In a coastal and mountainous area like Roses, with the Gulf of Roses, Cap de Creus and the Gulf of Lion in the site’s visual and operational environment, investigators have to consider terrain, sea, weather and viewing geometry before treating an observation as extraordinary. The Air Force’s own history stresses the site’s panoramic position over those coastal areas, which is excellent for surveillance but also rich in possible visual references and reflections.[Ejercito Del Aire]ejercitodelaireydelespacio.defensa.gob.esUnidades - Unidad…
What the file does and does not prove
The EVA-4 report proves that a strange sighting was formally recorded at Roses in September 1991. It proves that several military personnel were associated with the observation. It proves that the report entered the Spanish Air Force’s UFO file system and was later declassified. It also proves that, according to the file summary, the radar-room operator reported no unusual echo and no abnormal equipment behaviour during the incident.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.esOpen source on gob.es.
It does not prove that an unknown aircraft flew over the site. It does not prove that the object was five metres in radius; that was an estimate. It does not prove that the object was at 150 metres altitude; that was also an estimate. It does not provide a photograph, a radar plot, a recovered object, or an independent civilian observation from outside the installation. Those absences do not make the witnesses dishonest, but they do limit what the case can bear.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
The file’s declassification note is also worth reading in a restrained way. The official catalogue says the file was declassified under a February 1996 decision, and the file text states that no aspects were seen that made it advisable to keep it as classified material. That is not the same as saying the Air Force solved the case, and it is not the same as saying the event was extraordinary. It simply shows that the record was judged suitable for release.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.esOpen source on gob.es.
This is where the Roses case becomes useful rather than merely mysterious. It shows how a strong-sounding UFO label can shrink under close reading. “A UFO over a military radar base” sounds dramatic. “A visual sighting by guards at a radar squadron, with no anomalous radar echo reported” is still interesting, but much more cautious. That second wording is the one the evidence supports.
Why Roses matters in Girona’s UFO history
Roses matters because it gives Girona’s UFO record a military and air-defence dimension. The province’s official UFO-linked material includes other kinds of cases, such as the Girona airport entry and the Blanes sighting, but EVA-4 is the one that most directly raises the question of how military observation should be weighed. The Defence Virtual Library title list places the Roses EVA-4 file alongside other Spanish Air Force UFO records, including reports from other air-surveillance units such as EVA-10, EVA-21, EVA-5 and EVA-7.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es› Listado de títulos…
That comparison helps put Roses in proportion. Spain’s official UFO archive was not a collection of alien confirmations; it was an administrative record of unusual reports in national airspace, many of them later weak, ambiguous or conventionally explainable. The value of the EVA-4 case is that it preserves the tension at the heart of military UFO material: better reporting conditions can make a case more worth studying, but they do not remove the need for corroboration.[Biblioteca Virtual Defensa]bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.esBiblioteca Virtual Defensa Expedientes OVNIBiblioteca Virtual Defensa Expedientes OVNI
For a Girona reader, the practical takeaway is clear. The Roses radar-site report should not be dismissed as a mere campfire story, because it has an official file, named military context and multiple reported witnesses. But it should not be inflated into a radar-confirmed encounter either. Its strongest contribution is methodological: it teaches readers to ask exactly what was observed, who observed it, what instruments did or did not record, and which details are estimates rather than measurements.
A cautious reading is the strongest reading
The best evidence for the Roses case is the declassified military file itself: a dated, place-specific report from EVA-4, with witness statements and an internal summary. The best reason for caution is also inside that same file: the radar room reported no strange echo or equipment anomaly. That makes the case neither worthless nor sensational. It is a documented visual report from a significant air-surveillance site, preserved in Spain’s official UFO archive, but not a confirmed radar track.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.
In Girona’s UFO history, that makes EVA-4 a useful corrective to both extremes. Believers can point to the military setting and the formal record. Sceptics can point to the absence of radar confirmation and the ordinary difficulties of night-time visual estimation. The most defensible position sits between them: something unusual was reported by guards at Roses in 1991, the report was taken seriously enough to be filed, and the surviving evidence is too limited to identify the cause with confidence.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: ejercitodelaireydelespacio.defensa.gob.es
Title: Ejercito Del Aire
Link:https://ejercitodelaireydelespacio.defensa.gob.es/EA/ejercitodelaire/es/Unidades/Unidad/e9b448f6-7fc7-11ee-99f3-005056bf91c5/
Source snippet
Unidades - Unidad...
2.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf
3.
Source: noaa.gov
Title: anomalous propagation
Link:https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/anomalous-propagation
4.
Source: weather.gov
Link:https://www.weather.gov/mlb/Doppler_Dual_Pol_Weather_Radar
5.
Source: archive.org
Link:https://archive.org/download/desclasificacion/desclasificacion.pdf
6.
Source: nasa.gov
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/sp-4012v7.pdf
7.
Source: bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es
Link:https://bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es/BVMDefensa/exp_ovni/es/consulta/busqueda_referencia.do?campo=idtitulo&idValor=395980
8.
Source: ufotransparency.com
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/intl-es-expediente-eva-4-rosas-1991-1991-09-13-avistamiento-en-eva-4-rosas-gerona
9.
Source: bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es
Link:https://bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es/BVMDefensa/exp_ovni/es/consulta/indice_campo.do?campo=idtitulo
Source snippet
› Listado de títulos...
10.
Source: bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es
Title: Biblioteca Virtual Defensa Expedientes OVNI
Link:https://bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es/BVMDefensa/exp_ovni/es/micrositios/inicio.do
11.
Source: bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es
Title: defensa.gob.es Title list
Link:https://bibliotecavirtual.defensa.gob.es/BVMDefensa/exp_ovni/en/consulta/indice_campo.do?campo=idtitulo
12.
Source: ejercitodelaireydelespacio.defensa.gob.es
Link:https://ejercitodelaireydelespacio.defensa.gob.es/EA/ejercitodelaire/es/Unidades/Unidad/bc003ee6-83a1-11ee-99f3-005056bf91c5/
13.
Source: publicaciones.defensa.gob.es
Title: raa 615
Link:https://publicaciones.defensa.gob.es/media/downloadable/files/links/r/a/raa_615.pdf
14.
Source: defensa.gob.es
Title: resolucion 68360anonimizada
Link:https://www.defensa.gob.es/Galerias/main/2022/07/resolucion-68360anonimizada.pdf
15.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Anomalous propagation
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomalous_propagation
16.
Source: es.scribd.com
Title: 1991 09 13 Avistamiento en Eva 4 Rosas Gerona
Link:https://es.scribd.com/document/1009728813/1991-09-13-Avistamiento-en-Eva-4-Rosas-Gerona
17.
Source: predicalendar.ru
Link:https://www.predicalendar.ru/moon/calendar/1991/september/
18.
Source: es.linkedin.com
Link:https://es.linkedin.com/posts/ejercito-del-aire-y-del-espacio_el-grupo-m%C3%B3vil-de-control-a%C3%A9reo-grumoca-activity-7433052784004046848-Oab8
Additional References
19.
Source: youtube.com
Title: DECLASSIFIED UFO FILES: Why does science ignore them and governments don’t?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wunCPG7EBXs
Source snippet
How UFO Encounters Defeated Advanced US Fighter Jet Sensors | WION Podcast...
20.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Former Military Radar Technician Reacts to Newly Declassified UAP Evidence
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbC6dFb35Jo
Source snippet
DECLASSIFIED UFO FILES: Why does science ignore them and governments don't?...
21.
Source: youtube.com
Title: 72 UFO reports declassified with no evidence of extraterrestrial life
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEEpDnvLfyw
Source snippet
Former Military Radar Technician Reacts to Newly Declassified UAP Evidence...
22.
Source: youtube.com
Title: How UFO Encounters Defeated Advanced US Fighter Jet Sensors | WION Podcast
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdAwIJbNeQE
Source snippet
Pentagon UFO Footage Looks Impossible. Here's the Catch...
23.
Source: ace-high-journal.eu
Link:https://www.ace-high-journal.eu/-12–air-station-puig-major-.html
24.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/29862891/LOS_OVNIS_Y_EL_EJERCITO_DEL_AIRE
25.
Source: academia.edu
Link:https://www.academia.edu/35429868/Los_expedientes_OVNI_desclasificados_Online
26.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282366086_Aviation_Bird_Hazard_in_NEXRAD_Dual_Polarization_Weather_Radar_Confirmed_by_Visual_Observations
27.
Source: meteo.cat
Link:https://www.meteo.cat/observacions/xema/dades?codi=D4
28.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8cIWLLsnS5/
Topic Tree